deviant art

Deviant Login Shop
 Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
[x]
more ▶

More from $dxd in News

Featured in Groups:

Details

May 11, 2012
Sta.sh Writer
Link
Thumb

Statistics

Comments: 441
Favourites: 156 [who?]

Views: 46,657 (20 today)
[x]

CEA Blog: Mature Content

Fri May 11, 2012, 6:59 AM
Hey guys, today I want to talk about Mature Content on deviantART and hopefully clear up some misconceptions that exist around it. For those of you eager to look at some boobs and hot male torsos, I'm afraid I won't be including any here :petting:.

How the mature content filter works


All members over the age of 18 can choose to enable or disable the mature content filter to suit their needs. All members with a registered date of birth under the age of 18 have the mature content filter locked on and can not disable it. All logged out visitors have the mature content filter enabled and can not disable it.

The mature content filter is split in to two types, strict and warning. The strict filter is completely voluntary and prevents any deviant with the mature content filter on from accessing the work. The general or warning filter is the standard mature content tag and will remove the image from immediate view when browsing and place an warning page on the deviation which the viewer may click through to see the image at their discretion.

Misconceptions


A mature content tag means I can submit porn and shock pictures!
This seems to be a fairly common misconception, especially with younger members submitting illustrated works. Even with a mature content tag the following FAQs apply:

FAQ #565: You prohibit the submission of 'pornographic imagery'; what do you consider this to be?
FAQ #251: You prohibit the submission of 'pornographic literature'; what do you consider this to be?
FAQ #305: Is posting 'Adult' oriented artwork alright if I censor it first?
FAQ #248: Are there restrictions on art using children or teenagers (fictional or otherwise)?
FAQ #7: What is the policy concerning photographs of corpses, cruelty or death?

These policies apply to ALL submissions, regardless of any sort of tag, artist statement or self censorship. If a CEA member determines that an artwork violates one of these policies then it will be subject to removal without warning.

If it shows X then it MUST be marked as strict
We get a lot of reports that a deviation shows some content that a user doesn't like and they think it should have a strict mature content tag. We won't ever place or demand that a strict mature content tag be placed on a deviation, no matter what the content. The strict setting is there only for the submitting deviants peace of mind.

This image shows a person in lingerie, that needs to be tagged!
When it comes to nudity the mature content tagging system is only required under for actual nudity, this means, if you can see the genitals, anus or nipples if the model is female then it should have a tag. This counts even if they are clothed but you can clearly see through the clothing.

This does not apply to deviations where the model is shown in lingerie or clothing that covers genitals or a fully nude model where genitals, are not displayed.  If a models breasts aren't covered but the nipples are then that doesn't need a mature content tag. Body paint and items like nipple pasties may be enough to mean that a deviation doesn't need a tag.

deviantART staff are biased towards a specific gender
We do not give bias towards any gender or orientation. We do our best to apply our policies in an unbiased and objective manner. The CEA team is made up of 4 women and 3 men, we are very tolerant when it comes to nudity, gender and orientation. We don't remove an image because we don't like it and we don't allow images to remain because we do. We try to judge every deviation fairly and honestly according to our policies, if we're not sure then we discuss it as a team and err on the side of the deviant.

What should be marked as mature


As mentioned above, any deviation which clearly depicts visible genitals, female nipples or the anus should be tagged.

We also require that images depicting graphic violence or gore be tagged as mature. These should be actual or realistic depictions of significant injury, surgery, mutilation. or dismemberment. Any depictions of suicide should also be tagged.

It is worth noting that images depicting actual human death will be judged on a case by case basis. Images of actual death or injury that are found to be unnecessarily graphic (shock images) will be removed and may lead to further action being taken against your account. This includes unnecessarily graphic images of animal death or cruelty.

Images of a cartoonish or unrealistic nature or images of minor injuries do not necessarily require a mature content tag. This is the same for images showing blood where no injury is shown.

Ideologically sensitive material should also be tagged. What we mean here is the deliberate use of an offensive opinion or ideal aimed at at someone or something. This includes deviations which glorify, celebrate or promote offensive ideologies. Exceptions may be made for satire or parody but will be judge case by case.

Just because something is associated with an offensive ideology or belief does not mean that it's that it should be tagged or removed.

We do not require a mature content tag based on language used in a deviation, this tag is completely voluntarily and will not be imposed by a deviantART staff member.

In all cases where there is doubt over a reported image, we will discuss it as a team and we may choose to give the benefit of doubt to the artist. deviantART as a website aims to encourage artistic expression and freedom within our policies and so we will not remove or tag an image unless our policy requires it.

Sorry if this has been a little long, but hopefully this will give you a better understanding of our mature content system.

Add a Comment:
 
:icontanaii:
~Tanaii 5 hours ago  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
I wish the requirements for mature content were stricter. I believe the human body is beautiful and very inspirational, but I enjoy browsing deviantArt at work and someone wearing lingerie is not appropriate when it pops up on the front page of deviantArt. I have the mature content filter on, but it doesn't do me much good when a very provocative deviation pops up on the front page. If the mature content were required for such deviations, then I could chose to browse everything at home by taking off the filter, and I wouldn't have to worry about what deviations appear on the front page when I'm at work.
Reply
:iconsmilesupsidedown:
~SmilesUpsideDown 2 days ago  Student Traditional Artist
So basically if the people reviewing it think they can fap to it, then your totally reasonable 'report image' is thrown back in your face. Whenever i find an image that breaks these rules I either never get any kind of response, or it's invalid, for no feasible reason.
Reply
:iconpegasusfantasy2000:
*PegasusFantasy2000 May 7, 2013  Hobbyist Writer
This is all good to know, but I do have a few questions. I'm planning to use my account mostly, if not entirely, for posting written works. Are references to sex allowed, so long as no actual sex scenes take place? What's the policy for writing detailed violence? And is vulgar language, such as the F-word, allowed?

If my questions could be answered, it would be much appreciated. :)
Reply
:iconcomikzink:
Mood: Delighted ~ComikzInk Apr 2, 2013   Digital Artist
I found this super helpful, I've always been concerned about the mature tag and what is acceptable without it. I may quote certain parts of this that apply to future works to ensure viewers know as well as I that the deviation is in fact within the required tag if need be :D

Thank you for making this :happybounce:
Reply
:icondarkheatart:
!DarkHeatArt Mar 27, 2013   General Artist
~beefers =I did just that and, Also you have been blocked.
You need professional help. Seek out mental health help.
:pointandlaugh:
Reply
:iconmoony131:
~Moony131 Mar 25, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
Being as someone who has had that 'unfortunate event' where I discover the mature content tag, I think, as most people are arguing whether or not we need one, is that we do need one. I used to go on deviantArt when I was under thirteen...sometimes seeing images that concerned me about this site. As I later got my account, I began to realize that this is just a daily basis where you search something and there's a censored image. People don't realize that if deviantArt didn't have that mature content filter, and that if the mature content allowed guests to view anything, then parents would file complaints. Such as where a child is underage; parents do not want to see their child looking at colorful imagery (colorful as in gory or pornographic). This is just my opinion and if my thoughts don't agree with yours, then there's nothing that can change that. It's my argument about the 'mature content' situation.
Reply
:icondarkheatart:
!DarkHeatArt Mar 13, 2013   General Artist
I think Censorship sucks ! If people are offended by nudity then they need to keep their mature content filters ON. The human body itself is probably the greatest work of art ever or ever will be. When you start letting the select, Rule what you have is a censored and numb collection of artist. I'm not a pornaholic and, I don't see artistry in everything that has nudity but, I do support the rights of others to judge for themselves. Personally about nudity, I don't think it's a big deal either way. What it is, Is a way and, Part of life. Do these people that are so offended never takes showers ? Do they never have sex ? If a vagina closed/open or a penis erect or not bothers you. Then you should'nt be looking at it. If you are offended look away. Go to another section. Or block that artist ( You do have that feature ) But, For a board or however many people are obejectionable to it. They should NOT have majority rule. We live in a free society and by censoring what a board or " Some people" find offensive is not fair or right. I'm not promoting one side or the other. But, What I am promoting is non censorship. I agree with a lot of you. Some things I don't see art in as I said but, That does NOT give me the right to tell you that , You can't view this or that or, That this or that is Obscene. Each individual has to make that decision for themselves. Under the law what should be censored is pedophilia and, Things such as this that ARE against the Law and, I support the Law but, I will NEVER support Censorship in any way , Shape or Form. I don't feel that I have the right to tell anyone what they can or can't see or do. That is not democracy. That is Facism and that my friends is repugnant for anyone to tell anyone else what their rights are, Or what their morals or values should be. I have seen too many brilliant artist in all genres stiffled by censorship or, By ideaology. There was a guy in the 1940's famous for this. Anything that he or his regime did'nt agree with, Was burnt, Mutillated, Destroyed or Killed. Is that the will you want imposed on you, Muchless your artwork no matter what the genre ? ...................
Reply
:iconbeefers:
~beefers Mar 26, 2013  Hobbyist Artist
maybe if someone censored that "guy in the 40s" then millions of people wouldn't have been killed.

I'm not in favor of censorship in most cases, but there are boundaries of good taste. I understand that's a subjective argument but when I first log in and I've got a picture of some guy holding his dick (and nothing else), I don't want to see that shit. I shouldn't have to put up my adult content filter just because I don't want to see pics of dicks. Male nude doesn't bother me, but I fail to see what pics of just genitals accomplishes in terms of art. Anything? And yes, I'd be saying the same of pics of just a vagina. There's no need for such things.
Reply
:icondarkheatart:
!DarkHeatArt Mar 26, 2013   General Artist
Well agreed.Like I said I don't see art in everything as you don't either but,I don't think You or I have the right to censor the masses. Personally,I don't find a monkey masturbating or someone blowing their brains out art either (And I use those as broad examples.) But, Who am I to say what You or anyone else can see or can't see. I just don't think the right or responsibility is mine or anyone else's. I mean if it were me and only me,Then maybe but, As for others.I'm no judge. To me there is art like Rembrandt which is basically nice but, It's a bunch of little naked angels on clouds. Not so much art to me but, I have NO right to judge or try and make up other peoples minds about it. That's not my place nor my duty. And, When it comes down to it as far as art or whatever. If I had a child, I'd much rather it see a man kissing a womans breast versus it seeing a man cut a womans breast off. But, Those are my views and,I don't expect anyone or, Feel that anyone has to subscribe to my viewpoint. Basically I think we agree for the most part but, I'm just trying to look at both sides of the coin here. I hope you can understand what I am saying here. I just don't feel it is anyones place to set them self up as Judge, Jury and, Executioner so to speak regarding censorship. It's like a piece of art that comes through your page from a group you may be in. If you like it you comment. If you don't care for it, Then you simply let it pass on by. Or a television program. If you like it, You watch it. If not, You simply flip the channel... Thanks for your input and, Viewpoint.
Reply
:iconbeefers:
~beefers Mar 26, 2013  Hobbyist Artist
Oh, I definitely get your point and have heard that argument from most anyone who doesn't want censoring in any form. To a large extent I agree, but I also feel that there are things that cross a line. Have you heard of the movie "A Serbian Film"? I haven't seen it because I chose not to, but from what research I've done, it's possibly the most vile, repugnant, ultra-violent piece of garbage put to film. It contains necrophilia, infanticide, pedophilia, murder, rape, illicit drug use, sexual violence, etc, all done so convincingly that it has left ever reviewer I've encountered shaken to the point of unbelief.

So I ask, what purpose does something like this serve? Is that kind of filth a benefit to a free society? I don't think so. When you break it all down, freedom exists when everyone agrees to play by the same set of rules. Is that then truly freedom? No. What is true freedom? Anarchy; when anyone can do whatever they want to whoever they want and whenever they want. Problem with anarchy is that many people's idea of personal freedom comes at the expense of someone else and then not everyone is free and the idea breaks down.

The point I make is that I believe there has to be a line, agreed on by the people, that shouldn't be crossed. There are simply things labelled "art" that provide no positive benefit upon it's consumption. The art snobs would say those things "provoke discussion" or "push boundaries" to which I reply... for what? Where is the benefit in pushing boundaries, especially the boundaries of good taste? I personally don't see the need or use for such things.

I understand some will disagree on the basis that freedom of expression (artistic expression included) must be allowed across the board from the good to the bad. Again, I'm not so sure that's in society's best interest. We've pushed societal boundaries very far in that last 40 years and I'm not sure we're better off or happier for it as a whole.

just my opinion.
Reply
Add a Comment: